The impact of the homestead exemption on the securitization
Introduction (Homestead Exemption SC)
Securitization is the route toward taking an illiquid asset, or social affair of focal points, and through cash related building, evolving it (or them) into a security. The offending articulation “securitization regular pecking request,” progressed by the film “Inside Job” about the 2007-2008 cash related crisis, portrays the system by which social affairs of such illiquid assets (ordinarily commitments) are packaged, bought, securitized and sold to monetary authorities. The system of securitization (Homestead Exemption SC) makes liquidity by enabling more diminutive monetary masters to purchase shares in a greater asset pool. It can incorporate the pooling of legitimately restricting commitments, for instance, auto advances and charge card commitment responsibilities, or any advantages that deliver receivables. Home advance upheld securities are a perfect instance of securitization. By combining contracts into one colossal pool, the sponsor can isolate the pool into humbler pieces in light of each house advance’s inborn threat of default and after that pitch those more diminutive pieces to theorists. With a home credit bolstered security, solitary retail monetary masters can purchase bits of a home advance as a kind of bond. Without the securitization of home credits, retail monetary experts will in all probability be not able remain to get tied up with a broad pool of home advances.
The examiners gain a rate of benefit based for the related chief and interest portions being made by the included obliged people on their responsibility. Not at all like some other wander vehicles, these are supported by unquestionable stock. Should a record holder stop portions on his leeway, it might be seized and traded to compensate those holding an excitement for the commitment. Like distinctive endeavors, the higher the risk, the higher potential rate of return. This interfaces with the higher advance costs less qualified borrowers are all things considered charged. Notwithstanding the way that the securities are back by indisputable assets, there is no affirmation that the preferences will keep up their regard should an obliged individual stop portion.
Bankruptcy is a real technique where you’re articulated unfit to pay your commitments. It can release you from most commitments, give assistance and empower you to make a fresh start.
Bankruptcy is a legitimate term for when a man or business can’t repay their striking commitments. The liquidation methodology begins with an interest to recorded by the borrower, which is most ordinary, or to serve credit managers, which is less typical. Most of the record holder’s advantages are evaluated and surveyed, and the preferences may be used to repay a piece of phenomenal commitment.
Bankruptcy offers an individual or business a chance to start fresh by acquitting commitments that essentially can’t be paid, while offering moneylenders a chance to get some extent of repayment in perspective of the individual’s or business’ points of interest open for liquidation. On a fundamental level, the ability to look for monetary security can benefit a general economy by giving individuals and associations another chance to get to buyer credit and by outfitting leasers with an extent of commitment repayment. Upon the productive complete of liquidation methods, the borrower is lessened of the commitment duties gained before announcing money related indebtedness.
The Small Business Administration’s (“SBA”) Standard Operating Procedures (“SOP”) is to require moneylenders collateralize advances more prominent than $350,000 to the most extreme degree conceivable up to the credit sum. As needs be, banks “must take accessible value in the individual land (private and venture) of the principals as security.”
Various states have authorized property laws that shield a person’s main living place from abandonment or constrained deal. Property laws are established with the purpose that account holders ought not end up destitute after a constrained deal. While most property laws don’t shield indebted individuals from loan bosses dispossessing a consensual liens – i.e. liens that protected particular obligation – various purviews have estate laws that can (I) repress a loan specialist’s capacity to abandon an individual habitation as well as (ii) restrain the recoverable estimation of a dispossessed lien upon main living place. As needs be, it is vital that banks comprehend the effect estate laws may have on security.
For motivations behind this article, a “property” is a person’s main living place and incorporates the related land as well as abiding. An individual can build up a residence by living to the aspect of property and exhibiting an expectation to stay at the property. In a few wards, a residence might be built up by documenting the proper notice. Residence insurance is for the most part not stood to resources possessed by an organization and people can just have one property. Since property laws are state particular and nuanced, lawful insight ought to be locked in with any inquiries or concerns.
Estate laws are applicable while assessing who ought to execute a home loan. Residence rights are resolved not as indicated by the gatherings recorded on the deed, yet rather as per who has set up estate rights in a property. For instance, the two life partners could have estate rights in their main living place in spite of just a single companion showing up on the deed. A moneylender could experience issues dispossessing a home loan that was not recognized or executed by the mate not showing up on the deed but rather who has substantial estate rights in the property. Such a powerlessness to abandon a private home loan could imperil the SBA’s certification.
Texas gifts people the best residence insurance in the association. Under Texas law, and except for first position buy cash liens, a very require consensual deed of trust that is recorded against a residence may not be abandoned upon. Texas law is misty whether a very required deed of trust is recorded against a residence would end up operable would the property lose its estate status later on. Loan bosses regularly settle on a business choice and choose not to record a very required deed of trust on a Texas residence property in light of the powerlessness to dispossess.
Literature Review
Precautions when addressing homestead laws from the view point of Lenders
South Carolina (Homestead Exemption SC) law permits dispossessing estates, however secures fluctuating measures of value contingent upon the number and qualities of the gatherings who have set up the property as their residence. For instance, South Carolina estate law ensures $75,000 in a residence if just a single individual lives at the property and that individual is younger than 65. A bank would just have the capacity to abandon a property if the returns from the deal would surpass $75,000.00. In such a dispossession, the main $75,000.00 would be reserved to the account holder and every single overabundance store would be accessible to loan bosses.
Moneylenders ought to consider playing it safe while tending to estate laws,
Confirm to the Mortgagor’s Homestead, pp. The Principals swearing various private properties ought to affirm which the property is and isn’t their estate. This might be refined by means of a testimony expressing which the address is the principal’s residence. Confirm to the Homestead that has been developed Pursuant to the State Law, pp. The veracity of an estate testimony ought to be affirmed against state law. A few inquiries to investigate include, pp. Does the important live at the expressed residence? Has a property been set up compliant with state necessities? Is the vital an occupant of the state where the property is found. On a Mortgage, this is to have the Signature of every Individual who has been claiming the “Collateral Residence as a Homestead”, pp. Lenders ought to consider having the two life partners execute as well as recognize the home loan to best guarantee the capacity to abandon a property has been saved.
The role of homestead exemption on the securitization in US personal bankruptcy
Regularly, every state has exemption laws that describe the estimation of the property that can be protected from leaser gathering exercises inside the state, while there moreover are government prohibitions applying in chose cases. Essentially, home prohibitions describe the proportion of hotel wealth that record holders may shield from liquidation. In the past thirty years, the United States has had two important changes of its own liquidation laws that have liberally impacted the way by which avoidances may be used in singular Bankruptcy. The Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 was a total switch that developed a uniform national arrangement of special cases while empowering states to stop and set their own specific rejection levels if needed. Simply more starting late, the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act as (BAPCPA) of 2005 put three essential restrictions on the record holder’s ability to take part in pre-indebtedness needing to overhaul the usage of Bankruptcy special cases.
In the first place, the demonstration enabled judges to invert any benefit exchanges amongst exclusion and non-exception classes made right away before the insolvency recording. The goal was to keep borrowers from trading unprotected resources for resources secured under exceptions or exchanging responsibility for advantages for well-disposed outsiders at falsely low costs, just to turn around the exchange once the liquidation case was shut. Second, the change of 2005 acquainted an arrangement that points with keep families from ”discussion shopping”, i.e. moving to states with especially liberal exceptions quickly. Third, the change set a top on the residence exclusion in circumstances where the account holder has increased the value of the estate amid the time to figure out 1215 days (around the time is 3 years and 4 months) going before the liquidation case.9 In the observational work, this is to consider the fact whether the relative negligible motivating force to put resources into home value for family units with home value beneath or more the exception is diverse for the pre-change period before 2005. In that case, the quantity of filings crested at around 1.4 million out of 2005 preceding tumbling to around 400,000 of every 2006, as family units obviously endeavored to exploit the more positive principles previously BAPCPA was established. By 2009, it had expanded back to a level of around 1 million, which shows that insolvency exclusions stay extremely important even after the change of 2005.
Taking a gander at living arrangement special cases in 1996 and 2006, we see that most states extended avoidance levels to some degree to adjust development and keep up the certified estimation of the rejections. A couple of states, in any case, took off more gigantic upgrades in their bequest special cases. Rhode Island, for example, extended its exemption total from $30,000 in 1996 to $300,000 in 2006, DC moved from the administration property rejection to a vast special case in 2006, and Delaware changed from a zero living arrangement special case to an exemption of $50,000 in 2006 given that Delaware does not permit the use of the administration avoidance. Thusly, there is some time assortment in property special case levels, despite amazing cross-state assortment, which licenses us to use state level settled effects in a part of our observational points of interest underneath.
Home estimation theory is extraordinary in that home estimation tends to benefit by an awesome treatment in US singular law as domain avoidances. Likewise, interests in home estimation underneath the rejection level engage families to ensure their usage against negative fiscal paralyzes. This paper is the first to assess how home prohibitions impact wander in home estimation using organized US nuclear family data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation over the 1996– 2006 period. We assess that the rate change in home estimation as an offer of the rate change in as a rule wealth is 25% lower if the fringe enthusiasm for home estimation isn’t anchored by the prohibition. Our example coefficients suggest that at age 60 nuclear families in high prohibition states assign about $40,000 more toward arrive diverged from families in low exemptions states. This indicates more than 20% of their total ordinary wealth. The bob down in insignificant enthusiasm for cabin is more enunciated for more young families that may defy a higher probability of person.
The tendency in family portfolios toward home estimation incited by its remarkable protection suggests that these portfolios are not capable as they open the nuclear family to too much land chance in no-bankruptcy states of the world. Wealth security against singular indebtedness may be appealing (as proposed, for instance, by Li and Sarte (2006) in light of a reenactment appear), anyway its course of action through a special case for home estimation appears, apparently, to be senselessly distorting family portfolio choice. A prohibition for home estimation could be supported on the off chance that it by one means or another happened to affect home proprietorship, and if moreover home ownership conveyed positive externalities on neighborhood security, as stated by a significant literature.38 However, we don’t find enthusiastic affirmation that property special cases impact home ownership.
Threatening decision and great hazard concerning advance arrangements have been pondered from substitute perspectives. Straight credit bargains, generally as propel syndication, decrease the peril borne by the starting bank and in this manner may impact banks’ spurring powers to screen credits ex hazard and screen them ex post. Gorton and Pennacchi (1995) present a speculative model of propelling power idealize propel bargains and precisely record that banks hold a greater offer of the more unsafe advances to oversee spark issues. Sufi (2007) shows that the more dull the borrower, the more engaged the syndicate; Focarelli et al. (2008) give demonstrate that the more idea the syndicate, the lower the advance charge asked for by budgetary pros. Along relative lines, Drucker and Puri (2009) find that sold advances contain additional and more restrictive understandings, especially while illuminating issues are more outrageous. They also find that offering credits does not hamper the advancing relationship. This evidence is dependable with banks thinking about the piece of edifying asymmetries and finding techniques for directing a part of their things. Focuses on syndicated credits use propel level data, yet an ordinary deal does exclude pooling and tranching (except for, in a couple of respects, for Gorton and Pennacchi (1995)), which are the fundamental features of securitization trades and describe how chance is supervised by the two get-togethers. Also, the buyer knows whose progress is being sold and can assemble relevant information on the borrower; in this way, there is less expansion for educational asymmetries than with a hazy arrangement of points of interest. A second strand of the composition takes a gander at particularly how contract securitization impacts the excitement of banks to hold up under the cost of checking and screening. Dell’Ariccia et al. (2008), in light of aggregate data, exhibit that bank crediting measures declined more in areas with higher home advance securitization rates. Also Mian and Sufi (2009) find from area level data a connection between’s supply augmentation and resulting additions in contract default rates.
Our examination is closer to Keys et al. (2009, 2010), who measure the default rate of a case of sub-prime advances and find demonstrate unsurprising with securitization being compared with cut down propel quality. They assume that securitization is joined by antagonistic assurance. They also find that having “skin in the diversion” (keeping an offer of the securitized propels) in like manner enhances for quality advances being sold. One basic complexity from our examination is that Keys et al. try not to perceive securitized and unsecuritized credits. With a particular true objective to infer the effect of securitization on propel quality, the makers likewise consider the inconsistency of the default rate at a FICO score restrict used by pros to pick if a credit can be securitized or not. This approach is denounced by Bubb and Kaufman (2011), who stretch the potential endogeneity of monetary appraisal cutoff rules.
This paper (Homestead Exemption SC) differs from those by Keys et al. similarly in various respects. As authoritatively pointed out, it investigates prime home advances, which build up by a long shot the greater part of credits, and ventures outside the U.S. to check how illuminating asymmetries play out in a country, for instance, Italy with an institutional and regulatory framework like what is inescapable in the European Union, the second greatest market for ABS on the planet. Concerning the examination of the segments that can be sanctioned to direct hilter kilter information, our essential responsibility is to uncover some knowledge into the piece of reputation building segments.
Securitization as a deterrent to renegotiation
In securitization (Homestead Exemption SC), the association holding the credits, generally called the originator, gathers the data on the advantages it should need to oust from its related bookkeeping reports. These focal points are then gathered together by factors, for instance, the time remaining on a credit, the level of danger, the proportion of extraordinary imperative and others. This collected assembling of advantages, now contemplated a reference portfolio, is then sold to a patron. The underwriter makes tradable securities addressing a stake in the advantages related with the portfolio, pitching them to fascinated monetary authorities with a rate of return.
Securitization gives credit managers an instrument to cut down their related danger through the division of duty regarding commitment duties. The examiners enough take the circumstance of moneylender by getting tied up with the security. This empowers a leaser to oust the related assets from their bookkeeping reports.
The piece of securitization (Homestead Exemption SC) in thwarting renegotiation is proposed in Kruger (2017), and Zhang (2013). Piskorski et al. (2010) battle that banks’ renegotiation procedures for their held advances are likely closer to the perfect. What’s more, portfolio advance masters in like manner appear to have best renegotiation capacities over servicers of securitized contracts, as demonstrate by cut down re-default rates (Zhang, 2013). This written work fights that the qualifications are likely a direct result of office issues and institutional grindings. Such gratings join contracts between the credit servicer and the securitization expect that unequivocally block renegotiation, the inconvenience for servicers in recuperating the costs connected with renegotiation frames from the securitization trust, the peril of cases from senior applicants in “tranche battling,” and the risk of losing specific cost and accounting treatment (Levitin and Twomey, 2011). The more focal factor behind these contacts is likely the inconvenience of creating enforceable contracts that make the servicer make the perfect move, since renegotiation relies upon effort that is hard to watch and check (Levitin and Twomey, 2011). For sure, notwithstanding missing institutional contacts, moneylenders who hold their home advances may have more grounded sparks to renegotiate if they have credits in the geographic locale of the defaulting borrower, and thusly camouflage the externalities from dispossessions (Favara and Giannetti, 2017). The correct essentialness of these contacts is tended to by Adelino (2013), in light of evidence suggesting that securitized contracts are as inclined to be adjusted as held ones. In any case, their choice relies upon a perhaps precarious computation for perceiving alterations, rather than coordinate obser-vation (Agarwal et al., 2011b; Piskorski et al., 2010; Zhang, 2013).
Additionally, Ghent (2011) questions the piece of securitization by recording undeniable affirmation of low renegotiation rates in the midst of the Great Depression notwithstanding the way that few home advances had been securitized. In any case, Rose (2011) observes that at the time, an organization program acquired exasperates home advances from banks at close standard and accordingly likely diminished their capacity to renegotiate credits. Notwithstanding whether an agreement isn’t completely accomplished, the staggering viewpoint that has created after the crisis is that securitization made renegotiation more troublesome. Less is considered whether exhibit individuals thought about this potential issue before the crisis snatched hold, and adjusted their decisions to the issue. This is the issue tended to in this paper.
The effect of lawful rules on contract propels and honest to goodness results Judicial deserting essentials constrain impressive costs on credit masters, not due to the costs of the court strategy itself, yet likewise on account of a high depreciation rate in the midst of the oftentimes broad strategies. Pence (2006) measures that the total additional dispossession costs in lawful states could be up to 10% of the progress balance.10 The refinement between the two sorts of states has likely extended further in the continuous relinquishment wave, as courts in legitimate states have been overburdened with surrender cases (Cordell., 2015). The probability that the higher cost of surrender in legitimate states may lead moneylenders toward more renegotiation was first best in class by Clauretie (1987). Simply more starting late, Mian (2015) used legitimate necessities as an instrumental variable for think the real effects of dispossessions in the midst of the continuous deserting wave. They report that non-lawful states had higher relinquishment rates and likewise greater downturns in house costs and bona fide fiscal outcomes, yet also observed a more sharp following recovery. Legitimate rules may in like manner impact propel supply and esteeming. Pence (2006) chronicles that moneylenders cut down the credit aggregates in lawful states. Dagher and Sun (2016) moreover find an effect using a loan supply by think the probability of propel application affirmation. Curtis (2013) fights that lawful precepts broadened the bit of the general business of subprime credit masters in the midst of the impact. Finally, Harrison and Seiler (2015) consider the effect of assortment in lawful models and other regulatory factors on contract advance expenses. By analyzing securitization rates, this paper supplements our appreciation of the channel behind these outcomes. Most clearly, the results recommend that the higher dispossession rate in nonjudicial states chronicled by Mian (2015) is generally a direct result of the underhanded effect of a higher securitization rate, which changes over into a higher surrender rate as a result of the higher dispossession propensity among securitized contracts.
The securitization method
Securitization is an amazing technique that incorporates a couple of performing craftsmen. The chart underneath, taken from the IMF site, diagrams the central framework for trading assets and making securities:
The component that at first holds the advantages (the originator) begins the technique by pitching the preferences for a legal substance, a SPV (Special Purpose Vehicle), interestingly made to compel the threat of the last examiner versus the underwriter of the focal points. A SPV is in like manner insinuated as a “channel.” Then, dependent upon the situation, the SPV either issues the securities particularly or trades the pool of assets for a “trust” that, in this manner, issues the securities(the trust is extremely used for a couple of securitization trades and along these lines regulates a couple of SPVs).
A SPV is all the more a legal structure than a part that has a working impact in the trade. The most basic part is played by the arranger, regularly a bank, who sets up the trade and evaluates the pool of assets,the way by which it will be fed, the ascribes of the securities to be issued, and the potential sorting out of the store.
The topic (Homestead Exemption SC) of the getting sorted out is to exhibit the qualities of the securities with the ultimate objective that they contrast with the prerequisites of the last monetary authority. As opposed to essentially paying the last theorist the salary created by the focal points, the amortization rules for the security are portrayed early.
Some ABSs can be “beat up,” inferring that the pool of favorable circumstances can be refed in the midst of the life of the security. This makes it possible to renegotiate without a moment’s hesitation commitments, (for instance, charge card commitment) with whole deal bonds.
Finally, the arranger accept a basic part in passing on the securities to the last monetary masters (scattering). Consistently, the securities are not issued on an exchange, but instead are spread over-the-counter to couple of monetary experts.
The trio of entertainers including the “originator, SPV,and arranger” sets up the “Start to-Distribute” show, which has thrived through the range of the past couple of years.
A fundamental capability must be made between “ordinary” securitization, where the advantages are extremely sold to the SPV (“certified arrangement”), and what is known as “produced” securitization, where the originator holds obligation regarding assets and trades only the risk to the SPV, by methods for a credit auxiliary. This trade passes on no liquidity to the assignor, yet engages himto externalize the peril related with holding the securitized assets.
Characteristics of the securities issued
All ABS are commitment securities and subsequently address a commitment that has an obliged term and that pays a particular proportion of pay, figured by a game plan of predestined standards (anyway this salary isn’t generally guaranteed!). Past that, there is a broad assortment of systems to peruse for finding out coupons and repayment.
The concealed assets are the SPV’s singular wellspring of pay, which it can, hence, redistribute to budgetary authorities. There are two sorts of shrouded livelihoods: interest portions from one perspective, and repayment of capital on the other. Ordinarily, the interest got is used to pay the eagerness on the securities issued, while the capital got is used to repay the securities themselves.
On account of the possibility of the shrouded assets, which will conventionally be repaid sooner or later through paralyzed portions (one of the issues that the arranger must face is dealing with the early repayment of commitment), the securities issued can be amortized, which infers that the face regard reduces over the life of the security. The extent of the present face a motivating force to the principal confront regard is insinuated as the “pool factor.”
A couple of ABS, in any case, are repaid in one single sum toward the complete of the life of the security (“Bullet amortization”).
Along these lines, one typical for ABS is that, habitually, the feasible date of repayment(s) isn’t resolved when the security is issued.
Bankruptcy Module
All Bankruptcy cases in the United States are managed through government courts. Any decisions over government indebtedness cases are made by a Bankruptcy judge, including whether an obligated individual is met all requirements to archive or whether he should be discharged of his commitments. Regardless, from time to time, association over Bankruptcy cases is managed by a trustee, someone chosen by the United States Trustee, an officer of the Department of Justice, to address the obliged individual’s area in the strategy. There is for the most part beside no contact between the obliged individual and the judge, with the exception of if there is some challenge set forth in the safeguard by an advance manager.
Individuals or associations with few or no favorable circumstances report. The area empowers individuals to dispose of their obligations without security, for instance, Mastercards and clinic costs. Individuals with nonexempt assets, for instance, family treasures (gatherings with high valuations, for instance, mint piece or stamp collections), second homes and vehicles, and cash, stocks or securities, must pitch the property to repay a couple or the greater part of their obligations without insurance. Along these lines, you’re in a general sense selling your advantages remembering the ultimate objective to get together your commitment. Customers who have no imperative assets and simply exculpated property, for instance, family items, clothing, mechanical assemblies for their trades and an individual vehicle up to a particular regard, repay no bit of their obligation without guarantee.
Associations routinely record Chapter 11 bankruptcy, the goal of which is to upgrade and in fact ended up being gainful. Recording Chapter 11 bankruptcy empowers an association to make prepares for advantage, cut costs and discover better ways to deal with manufacture pay. For example (Homestead Exemption SC), a housekeeping business recording Chapter 11 bankruptcy may grow its rates insignificantly and offer more organizations to wind up beneficial. Area 11 indebtedness empowers a business to continue driving its step by step errands without interruption, while wearing down a commitment repayment plan under the court’s supervision. In unprecedented cases, individuals archive Chapter 11 liquidation.
Individuals who benefit to meet all prerequisites for Chapter 7 liquidation may report under Chapter 13. The part empowers individuals and associations to make useful commitment repayment outlines. As an end-result of repaying their leasers, the courts empower these borrowers to keep the larger part of their property including nonexempt property.
While it may mitigate you of your legal duty to repay your commitments, requesting of for money related security has results. Dependent upon the kind of demand, a Bankruptcy will hurt your FICO score. In the event that you’re endeavoring to understand in case you should archive, your credit is no doubt adequately hurt. A Chapter 7 recording will stay on your credit report for quite a while, while a Chapter 13 will remain there for seven. Any banks you hit up for commitment (a progress, Mastercard, credit augmentation or home advance) will see the discharge on your report, which will shield you from getting any credit.
References
Agarwal, S., Lucca, D., Seru, A., and Trebbi, F. 2014. Inconsistent regulators, pp. Evidence from banking. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(2), pp.889-938.
Ahn, J.-H. and Breton, R. 2014. Securitization, competition and monitoring. Journal of Banking and Finance, 40(3), pp.195-210.
Clauretie, T. and Herzog, T. 1990. Homestead Exemption SC. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 22(2), pp.221-233.
Corradin, S., Gropp, R., Huizinga, H., and Laeven, L. 2016. Homestead Exemption SC. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 25, pp.77-98.
Dahger, J. and Sun, Y. 2016. Borrower protection and the supply of credit evidence from foreclosure laws. Journal of Financial Economics, 121(1), pp.195-209.
Demiroglu, C., Dudley, E., and James, C. M. 2014. State foreclosure laws and the incidence of mortgage default. The Journal of Law and Economics, 57(1), pp.225-280.
Eisdorfer, A. 2008. Empirical evidence of risk shifting in financially distressed firms. Journal of Finance, 63, pp.609-637.
Frame, W. S. and White, L. J. 2005. Homestead Exemption SC? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(2), pp.159-184.
Gerardi, K., Lambie-Hanson, L., and Willen, P. 2013. Do borrower rights improve borrower outcomes? evidence from the foreclosure process. Journal of Urban Economics, 73(1), pp.1-17.
Ghent, A. 2014. How do case law and statute differ¨? lessons from the evolution of mortgage law. The Journal of Law and Economics, 57(4), pp.1085-1122.
Ghent, A. C. and Kudlyak, M. 2011. Recourse and residential mortgage default evidence from us states. Review of Financial Studies, 124(9), pp.3139-3186.
Gorton, G. and Pennacchi, G. 1995. Banks and loan sales marketing nonmarketable assets. Journal of Monetary Economics, 35(3), pp.389-411.
Greenbaum, S. and Thakor, A. 1987. Bank funding modes, Securitization versus deposits. Journal of Banking and Finance, 11, pp.379-401.
Gropp, R., Scholz, J., and White, M. 1997. Personal bankruptcy and credit supply and demand. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(1), pp.217-251.
Han, J., Park, K., and Pennacchi, G. 2015. Corporate taxes and securitization. Journal of Finance, 70(3), pp.1287-1321.
Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. 1976. Theory of the firm, Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, pp.305-360.
Keys, B., Mukherjee, T., Seru, A., and Vig, V. 2010. Did securitization lead to lax screening? evidence from subprime loans. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(1), pp.307-362.
Keys, B., Seru, A., and Vig, V. 2012. Homestead Exemption SC. Review of Financial Studies, 25(7), pp.2071-2108.
Lee, D. S. and Lemieux, T. 2010. Regression discontinuity designs in economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(2), pp.281-355.
Lin, E.Y. White, M. 2001. Bankruptcy and the market for mortgage and home improvement loans. Journal of Urban Economics, 50(1), pp.138-162.
Loutskina, E. 2011. The role of securitization in bank liquidity and funding management. Journal of Financial Economics, 100(3), pp.663-684.
Loutskina, E. and Strahan, P. 2009. Homestead Exemption SC. Journal of Finance, 64(2), pp.861-922.
McCrary, J. 2008. Homestead Exemption SC. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), pp.698-714.
Melzer, B. T. 2017. Mortgage debt overhang, Reduced investment by homeowners at risk of default. The Journal of Finance, 72(2), pp.575-612.
Mian, A., Sufi, A., and Trebbi, F. 2015. Foreclosures, house prices, and the real economy. The Journal of Finance, 70(6), pp.2587-2634.
Milonas, K. 2017. The effect of foreclosure laws on securitization, Evidence from u.s. states. Journal of Financial Stability, 33, pp.1-22.
Pence, K. M. 2006. Foreclosing on opportunity, State laws and mortgage credit. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(1), pp.177-182.
Pennacchi, G. 1988. Loan sales and the cost of bank capital. Journal of Finance, 43, pp.375-396.
Purnanandam, A. 2010. Originate-to-distribute model and the subprime mortgage crisis. Review of Financial Studies, 24(6), pp.1881-1915.
Schill, M. 1991. An economic analysis of mortgagor protection laws. Virginia Law Review, 77(3), pp.489-538.
Stiglitz, J. and Weiss, A. 1981. Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. American Economic Review, 71(3), pp.393-410.
Homestead Exemption SC, Homestead Exemption SC, Homestead Exemption SC Prepared by —————————————
Written by
Email: [email protected]